Lawsuits filed against Pennsylvania Supreme Court: Entire Pennsylvania judicial system alleged to be unconstitutional
Two separate lawsuits were leveled against the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and other defendants Thursday, September 4.
Congressional candidate for Pennsylvania’s Eleventh District, Andy Ostrowski, was the first to file against the courts, in the United States Middle District of the Third Circuit. The second to file is Ed Bogan, who submitted his case in the United States Eastern District Court. He also named the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel as defendants, among others.
Besides the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Ostrowski named as defendants the Pennsylvania Disciplinary Board, Paul Killion, Robert Fulton, Deon Turner, Robert Snook, Capitol Police, Officer Sloan, 1–25 John/Jane Does, and Dunmore lawyer Brian Cali.
Ostrowski lawsuit
Ostrowski’s lawsuit features as a prime grievance current disciplinary proceedings taking place against Don Bailey, which constitute a case of pure retaliation for Bailey’s speaking out against judges, according to Ostrowski.
Don Bailey is a former United States Congressman and PA Auditor General who was stripped of his law licence in October 2013.
Article 5, Section 10(c), of the Pennsylvania Constitution grants the Pennsylvania Supreme Court exclusive plenary authority over all aspects of the Pennsylvania judicial system. Such extensive authority violates the separation of powers and checks and balances needed in a representative democracy, according to Ostrowski.
What is needed, said Ostrowski, is for “the federal courts to enter a declaratory order to effectively strike down Article 5 Section 10C of the Pennsylvania Constitution, which is in direct violation of Article 4 of the United States Constitution. The entire judicial system of Pennsylvania is unconstitutional.”
If Ostrowski prevails it will force either the Pennsylvania legislature or the United States Congress to act.
This is the perfect issue for Congress, demanding congressional actions, said Ostrowski. “That is why I am running for Congress.”
Bogan lawsuit, page 1
In the case of Bogan, he asserts his ex-wife and her attorney falsely testified concerning his whereabouts at a critical time, claiming to witness him being in one place, when, in fact, he was at work at the maximum security prison where he is employed. “So I exercised my rights in accordance with the law,” said Bogan
Attorneys, before entering upon the duties of their office, are sworn in before an individual authorized to administer the oath pursuant to 42 Pa. Consolidated Statutes §2522 (Oath of Office), which reads:
“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support,
obey and defend the Constitution of the United States and the
Constitution of this Commonwealth and that I will discharge
the duties of my office with fidelity, as well to the court
as to the client, that I will use no falsehood, nor delay the
cause of any person for lucre or malice.”
“Any person refusing to take the oath or affirmation shall forfeit his office,” the statute states.
“The lawyer perjured herself; I reported her. They refused to protect the public, i.e., me,” said Bogan.
“Coming from a family that is employed in the law enforcement, judicial, and legislative sectors I/we placed a lot of faith in the court system. I can say (and also my family, i.e., parents, uncles, etc.) that it shocks us/me, how corrupt the Pennsylvania court system really is.
“The faith that I once did have in the Pennsylvania court has dwindled away to nothing.”
The Independent Gazette is continuing its ongoing series, “Custody for Cash,” an exposé documenting the family court system in Pennsylvanian and other locations in the country. Our next issue prints Monday, September 8.
Related articles:
i love it
Another great article!! I hope and pray that this is the beginning of change to the PA court system and a strong warning to the people abusing their power. Thank you to the entire Gazette team for your hard work in bringing these issues to the public. Best of luck to Andy and Ed. WIN!!!
The Problem will be the FACT that the Federal Courts are as Corrupt as The KEYSTONE MAFIAS KORTS. The ONLY JUSTICE left is in a Good Jury and the MAFIA KORTS will use every DIRTY TRICK in the Books to Lie, Cheat and Steal these Folks Due Process. My Bet is The Cases will never get past some TRUMPED UP Technicality after of course a period of ILLUSIONARY proper treatment to FOOL People into believing the SYSTEM works. IF the Keystone Mafias KORTS are unconstitutional IMAGINE the Glitch in the MATRIX that would cause. Organized Crime in Pennsylvania is RAMPANT and has been going on a Very Very Very LONG TIME ……. Facts Are Difficult Things. See http://www.bing.com/search?q=immunity+plf&form=IE10TR&src=IE10TR&pc=MAGWJS
Judson Witham
JoAnnKennedy The Problem will be the FACT that the Federal Courts are as Corrupt as The KEYSTONE MAFIAS KORTS. The ONLY JUSTICE left is in a Good Jury and the MAFIA KORTS will use every DIRTY TRICK in the Books to Lie, Cheat and Steal these Folks Due Process. My Bet is The Cases will never get past some TRUMPED UP Technicality after of course a period of ILLUSIONARY proper treatment to FOOL People into believing the SYSTEM works. IF the Keystone Mafias KORTS are unconstitutional IMAGINE the Glitch in the MATRIX that would cause. Organized Crime in Pennsylvania is RAMPANT and has been going on a Very Very Very LONG TIME ……. Facts Are Difficult Things. See http://www.bing.com/search?q=immunity+plf&form=IE10TR&src=IE10TR&pc=MAGWJS
This is great! The attorney being called out on pergury. Thought I would never see it since it is commonplace for them to get away with this over and over. I have evidence of these types of violations with many folks involved in our cases. I tried to file against the custody evaluator and can prove that he perjured himself but the state shut down that investigation. Good luck to both of you. If PA continues to deny PA citizens their rights to continue their corruption, we all lose.
(Fact) It’s Official: Public Corrupted
Crooked Medicare Fraudster Governor RICK SCOTT has destroyed Lee
County Florida’s Economy. Lee County’s Economy is in a State of
Emergency due to all the Outrageous Public Corruption going in the
Number One Ranked County in The Nation for Public Corruption,
Discrimination, Mortgage Fraud Cover Up’s and Organized Scheme to
Defraud Horrific Crimes being committed by Governor Rick Scott’s Lee
County Public Corrupted Officials engaging in Florida State Rico
Violation’s with Co-conspirator’s Sheriff Mike Scott, Florida State
Attorney Stephen B. Russell, Judge Sherra Winesett, attorney general
Pam Bondi, Det. John Paccione, Det. Kenny Ellis, Rosa Estrada,
attorney Thomas S. Heidkamp, attorney Michael D. Randolph, attorney
Andrew S. Epstein.
U.S. attorney general to Gov. Rick Scott:
We’re watching you
By http://www.tampabay.com/writers/steve-bousquet and http://www.tampabay.com/writers/alex-leary, Times/Herald Tallahassee Bureau
http://www.tampabay.com/blogs/the-buzz-florida-politics/us-attorney-general-holder-to-rick-scott-were-watching-you/2191033
Sign Petition NOW! against Governor
Rick Scott pertaining to the Largest Organized Public Corruption
Cover Up in the History of the State of Florida.
Go here to
sign—–>
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/982/222/963/petition-against-governor-rick-scott-by-enzo-vincenzi
http://stopforeclosurefraud.com/2014/07/09/eight-reasons-pam-bondi-is-the-worst-attorney-general-in-florida-history/?fb_action_ids=663701733713033&fb_action_types=og.comments&fb_source=aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=288381481237582http://blogs.browardpalmbeach.com/pulp/2014/07/8_reasons_pam_bondi_is_the_worst_attorney_general_in_florida_history_draft.php
Florida
The Most Fraudulent State In America: 24/7 Wall_St.
Anyone who has any information leading
to the ARREST and Conviction of Con Artist Convicted Felon Miriam
Pacheco, Maria T. Torres and Blanca Rosa Sachatouras, CONTACT
N.Y./Florida Investigator Bob Nygaard at 561- 596-3443.
This is good. Time to kick bricks out of PA corruption. Corruption in zoning is deep and a way of life in Philadelphia. Mayor Nutter, District Attorney Seth Williams are already being sued for taking homes. But it doesn’t stop there. The political machine in Northwest Philadelphia dug up a contaminated site next to my house and caused permanent damage. The judge didn’t care about the demolition , excavation and environmental violations and crimes. This was a very politically connected project. District Attorney’s best friends directly involved. City Planner who worked 30 years with City Council wrote the City had engineered a conspiracy against me. They have been terrorizing me, landing me hospital numerous times, lying and covering up their crimes for years. The top officials lied a lot during the aftermath of the Market Street demolition deaths. They pretended they didn’t know anything about demolition safety even though they knew all about my problem and put great effort in “offing” me. Deputy Mayor Alan Greenburg had received 1st rate demolition protocol and safety from Baltimore at a Public Interest Law Center Symposium in 2011. Plus years of notification of violation at the site next to me and reference to their own rules, state rules and what other cities had, They didn’t care. They were trying to kill me so their cronies could go ahead and build their project. Today it came out that a Philly cop filed lawsuit against the police department for corruption and exposes what we all know and what the police did to me. Ly about situation and set people up. The 14th district endanger4ed my life many times as did every single member of the city counsel and the District Attorney directed colluded with the crimes against me. They are ruthless and brutal and will kill and cover up their crimes in favor of politics and cronyism and dollar bills.
maggieannamae Sure would like some more details. You can share maybe ? Stay Strong …… The Worms are being exposed and dealt with all the time.
Ask your Law Enforcement Folks what THEY HAVE DONE to preserve protect and defend the constitution. If the answer is they are following the orders of a judge,
ASK IF THEY SEE THE PROBLEM WHEN THE JUDGE IS IGNORING YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
Everyone has Constitutional Rights up until they don’t. And then, there’s nothing you can do about it. No where to turn. No politicians to help. The lawyers are mandated to ignore you. The non-lawyers ask their lawyers what it’s all about… and are misinformed into ignoring you.
http://work2bdone.com/live/2014/09/cease-desist-aba-dismisses-constitution/
TeranceHealy The Factual Aspects are suppose to be a JURY Question and ONLY a Fact Finder’s Prevue to answer. The problem is that Police Protect Judges and Judges Protect Police. The Government KNOWS when Self Interests are what THEY need to be protecting. This is EXACTLY WHY We Common Folk need to stick together and Protect Each Other.
Good Luck Andy and Ed!
I’m looking to file in Federal real soon.
Here is an email I wrote asking questions about the Washington State Bar Association’s Office of Disciplinary Counsel’s conduct in a disciplinary case it prosecuted, In re Karen Unger. To its credit, the Washington State Supreme Court found its own Office of Disciplinary Counsel had brought a frivolous proceeding and awarded Ms. Unger $60,000 in attorney fees. Former Justice Richard Sanders stated that he was “outraged” by the conduct of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel. I also asked these questions of the WSBA Board of Governors. None of my questions have been answered.
From: Paul Simmerly []
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 12:22 AM
To: ‘gdahl@comcast.net’
Subject: FW: WSBA payment of $60,000 from Bar members’ funds to attorney
Karen Unger for frivolous disciplinary proceeding
Importance: High
MR. DAHL:
Here is an email I wrote to Mr. Zachary Mosner, former
Chairperson of Review Committee IV, about the Karen Unger matter in which
you served as Hearing Officer. Of course, I have had no response to that email.
A number of us were wondering whether you have been appointed as a Hearing
Officer in any disciplinary case since you handled the Unger matter. Can you
please speak to this?
PAUL E. SIMMERLY
14418 S.E. 24th Street
Bellevue, WA 98007
(425) 830-8218
From: Paul Simmerly []
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 12:20 AM
To: ‘zacharym@atg.wa.gov’
Subject: WSBA payment of $60,000 from Bar members’ funds to attorney
Karen Unger for frivolous disciplinary proceeding
Importance: High
Hello Zach:
I have known
you since law school and we have crossed paths over the years in various cases
including work as outside counsel for First Interstate Bank and in our
discussions about my efforts to have your AG’s office and the DOJ pursue a
Medicaid/Medicare Fraud case involving J&J’s blockbuster anti-anemia drug
Procrit. You have always been a straight shooter.
Since you were
on the WSBA Disciplinary Board in 2006 and the Chairperson of Review Committee
IV that unanimously ordered the Karen Unger disciplinary matter to a hearing, I
wonder if you could answer a few questions for us about that case.
The WSBA agreed
to pay the sum of $60,000 to partially compensate attorney Karen Unger for her
attorney fees in defending against the disciplinary proceeding filed by the
Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) in In re Karen Unger, Public
No. 06#00071. Ms. Unger had been accused of attorney misconduct in representing
a criminal defendant in a federal court criminal proceeding. The disciplinary
counsel, Kathleen Dassel, had previously been a state and federal public
defender. The Chief Disciplinary Counsel, Douglas Ende, was a specialist in
criminal appellate law while in private practice. The Hearing Officer, Gregory
Dahl, found that the disciplinary proceeding was frivolous and without merit.
Ms. Unger’s counsel, David Allen, one of Washington’s pre-eminent attorneys, stated
that the Office of Disciplinary Counsel presented false, untrue and
misleading information to your Disciplinary Board’s Review Committee,
which determines whether a disciplinary proceeding proceeds to hearing. The
entire file in the In re Unger proceeding is contained on line at
http://www.legalez.com/unger.pdf
and in the attached UNGER SETTLEMENT document.
My questions to you are:
Was
this matter kept a secret from WSBA members? If so, why? Why wasn’t I provided
information about this matter when I first inquired about it in 2008? How was
this disclosed or publicized to WSBA members over the past six years? Why was
this kept a secret from the members of the Bar and, apparently, from at least some
members of the Supreme Court like Justice Sanders? Why was there a cover-up?
Was the purpose of the non-disclosure to influence the WSBA membership vote on
the dues rollback vote?
Are
transparency and trust important to the ODC, the Disciplinary Board and
the WSBA?
How
many times has the Hearing Officer, Gregory Dahl, been appointed as the Hearing
Officer since serving in the Unger case?
Where
did this settlement money come from? What is the legal authority for this
payment?
Why
didn’t the Bar pay all of Unger’s attorney fees, which I understand were
over $100,000?
Was
there any kind of investigation into the conduct of the WSBA’s Office of
Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) handling this matter? If not, why not? As former
Justice Sanders states*(see my email exchange with former Justice Sanders
below), why are these members of the Office of Disciplinary Counsel still
working there? Why haven’t they been fired and disbarred like the Duke Lacrosse
Prosecutor in NC, Mike Nifong? Justice Sanders was “outraged at the time” and
“still is”. If the ODC can bring a disciplinary proceeding against attorney
Madeline Gauthier for filing an allegedly frivolous show cause proceeding (see
attached email to all members of WSBA), why shouldn’t the responsible ODC attorneys
also be subject to disciplinary proceedings for bringing a disciplinary
proceeding against Ms. Unger that has been found to be frivolous?
Why
was Justice Owens allowed to testify on Ms. Unger’s behalf in violation of the
Rules?
Why don’t
you or the Disciplinary Board or the Review Committee or the Supreme Court care
that these kinds of misrepresentations were made by the ODC to the Review
Committee?
Thank you for
your anticipated response.
PAUL E. SIMMERLY
14418 S.E. 24th Street
Bellevue, WA 98007
(425) 830-8218
Continued in Next Comment
*The emails exchanged with former Justice Sanders:
From: Rbsanders []
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 11:19 AM
To: Paul E. Simmerly
Subject: Re: In Re Unger and In Re Gauthier
Yes Paul, I have heard this. If I were still on the court I would try to get you all the details, but I think that might be difficult. But I’ll try if you can’t get satisfaction. I suggest you call Justice Owens. Karen Unger is her friend and she (Owens) recused from her case for that reason. She knows the details or could get them. Let me know what you find out. While I was on the court I tried mightly to change the rule which says if the lawyer loses he pays the bar’s reasonable attorney fees, but if he wins the bar doesn’t pay anything. You also might call Karen’s lawyer. Like I said if you strike out I’ll try to help myself. Great to hear from you.
Richard
In a message dated 7/27/2011 4:39:07 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, writes:
Justice Sanders: Well, I have struck out. I have been trying for three years to obtain this information. The ODC is free to take Membership money at any time? Why is this a secret? Is there misconduct going on that the Bar wants to remain secret? Why else wouldn’t this information be readily available? The ODC is retaliating against me and my clients. Please do not contact Justice Owens or any other sitting Justice. The ODC is claiming that this would be ex parte contact. Their reasoning escapes me.
PAUL E. SIMMERLY
Attorney at Law
(425) 451-1400
From: Rbsanders []
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2011 1:57 PM
To: Paul E. Simmerly
Subject: Re: In Re Unger and In Re Gauthier
When I first heard about this, a long time before you contacted me, I was outraged. Still am. I was also told the same attorney at fault is still employed by the bar. See my last message for further action.
Richard
Conflicts of Interest? This concept apparently has no application to members of the legal elite. It only applies to those attorneys who are considered peons. Here is a complaint I made about the unethical conduct of the Attorney general of the United States. Of course, it was ignored:
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Paul
E. Simmerly
14418
S.E. 24th Street
Bellevue,
WA98007
Phone:
(425) 830-8218
email:
July
10, 2013
Robin C. Ashton
Counsel
Office of Professional Responsibility
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 3266
Washington, DC 20530-0001
Dear Counsel Ashton:
I wish to make a complaint
to the Office of Professional Responsibility against Attorney General Eric
Holder over his refusal to have the Department of Justice intervene in the case
of U.S.
ex rel Duxbury and McClellan v. Ortho Biotech Products, LP, District Court of
Massachusetts Cause No. 03-CV-12189-RWZ, a Medicare Fraud False Claims
Act (“Qui Tam”) case involving Ortho Biotech’s blockbuster drug, Procrit. Ortho
Biotech Products, LP, is a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson.
The reason Mr. Holder and the
Department of Justice have failed to intervene is because Defendants Johnson
& Johnson and Ortho Biotech Products, LP, are clients of Mr. Holder’s
former law firm, Covington & Burling. Mr. Holder does not want to intervene
because it would hurt his former clients and undoubtedly force them to settle. Covington
& Burling represent Ortho Biotech Products, LP, in the Duxbury lawsuit. While in private practice, Mr. Holder specialized in
defending Big Pharma drug companies in Medicare Fraud cases. He may have even
worked on the Duxbury case while in private practice. The Duxbury
case has been ongoing for ten years. Ten pages of Covington & Burling’s
website (http://www.cov.com/) brag about how a client can benefit by its lawyer’s
government contacts.
In the 2009
DOJ prosecution of Big Pharma company Pfizer, Mr. Holder recused himself because
his firm, Covington & Burling, had worked defending Pfizer in that
prosecution. The same principles should apply in the Duxbury case and Mr.
Holder should recuse himself.
In another
recent Medicare Fraud case, the DOJ aggressively prosecuted Big Pharma company
Amgen over its marketing and sales practices for its drug Aranesp. Aranesp is
an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA); an anit-anemia drug. This Amgen prosecution directly benefitted Mr.
Holder’s former client, Johnson & Johnson, d/b/a Ortho Biotech Products,
LP, because Johnson & Johnson markets this same drug under the brand name
Procrit. This drug is given to dialysis patients and AIDS patients, has been
given to cancer patients (until it was determined that it promoted tumor
growth) and has been given, illegally, to cyclists to help them win races.
From
the attached DOJ Press Release announcing the $762 million settlement with
Amgen:
Amgen’s internal sales and marketing materials
made plain that Amgen’s misbranding of Aranesp was the company’s core business
strategy to gain market share from its only ESA competitor, Procrit, sold by
Johnson & Johnson.
The Duxbury
case is by far the biggest Medicare Fraud case in history – $3 to $10 billion
dollars in damages to the U.S. taxpayers. You would think that intervention in
this case would be just the thing Mr. Holder and the Obama Administration would
want right now. The Duxbury case has more proof than any previous
Medicare Fraud case in the form of vast amounts of documentation collected by the
whistleblowers. As detailed below, the marketing and sale of Procrit was the
subject of one of the biggest lawsuits in U.S. history, a six year long
secretarbitration between Amgen and
Johnson & Johnson (Ortho Biotech) that culminated in a six month long final
hearing. The Arbitration was conducted by an organization called JAMS
(Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Service).
The DOJ
has the unprecedented litigation benefit of having the entire record of this JAMS
Arbitration, transcribed and indexed, available for use in a Medicare Fraud
prosecution. Every aspect of the marketing and sale of this drug by both
Johnson & Johnson and Amgen was litigated to almost unbelievable lengths. As
an indication of the volume of the evidence which is available to the DOJ if it
wanted it, consider that Ortho was awarded attorney fees of $150 million as the
prevailing party in this secret JAMS arbitration. Presumably, Amgen attorneys
had a similar bill. That means that the DOJ has the unprecedented benefit of at
least $300 million in legal work by some of the finest attorneys in the nation
into how this drug was marketed and sold by Johnson & Johnson. Of course,
this secret arbitration also covered how Amgen marketed and sold the drug (same
drug, just different brand names). However, as far as I know, the DOJ has never
used, or even obtained, the evidence and testimony from this secret JAMS
arbitration, even though it aggressively prosecuted Amgen. Why is this? I think
it is because it would shed unwanted light on Johnson & Johnson’s illegal
conduct and people would ask, why prosecute Amgen and not also Johnson &
Johnson?
The
sale of this drug has been pervasive. Procrit was, at its height, Johnson &
Johnson’s most profitable drug, producing revenues of up to $4 billion per
year. It was the number one most reimbursed drug by Medicare. This is the same
drug used for “doping” by Lance Armstrong and other cyclists. Incredibly,
despite Amgen’s recent monumental legal problems, Amgen continues to sponsor
the Tour de California bike race. 500,000 people may have died from using this
drug.
Please
let me know if you need additional information or documentation. Thank you.
Very
truly yours,
PAUL
E. SIMMERLY
What we need in The United States of America is a bill called the Treason Act. It would be used to control our politicians and political parties. It would define what treason is and would have to be signed by the politicians before they could hold any position in office. It should have the definition of treason and also the penalties. The penalties should not be limited to death. It should includeall the money that the treasonous person including their family and extended family members have acquired in their lifetime in this country or any other country, including any and all properties such as stocks, bonds, corporations and any financial holdings. The definition of treason should include noncompliance of the Constitution, anything that hurts any citizen who is unable to take care of themselves due to age or sickness. I’m sure that if this bill was created to control and make our politicians accountable we would have a better country. This is just an idea to help make this country better. I’m sure that there are many other American citizens who could add even more to this. It would be used to protect all American citizens from corrupt, immoral politicians who take money or gratuities from corporations, private individuals and or other governments. This should be a requirement for all elected politicians only. If you have any ideas or thoughts pass this on or add to it.
Freedom is not free, your words are the first shots fired to acquire your freedoms, not only for you but for your children and their future, If we going to fight a war let’s fight it like, it’s going to be the last one, if we are going to do something let’s do it right, with the best of our abilities, let’s do it right so we do not have to do it again,
TeranceHealy
What we need in The United States of America is a bill called the Treason Act. It would be used to control our politicians and political parties. It would define what treason is and would have to be signed by the politicians before they could hold any position in office. It should have the definition of treason and also the penalties. The penalties should not be limited to death. It should includeall the money that the treasonous person including their family and extended family members have acquired in their lifetime in this country or any other country, including any and all properties such as stocks, bonds, corporations and any financial holdings. The definition of treason should include noncompliance of the Constitution, anything that hurts any citizen who is unable to take care of themselves due to age or sickness. I’m sure that if this bill was created to control and make our politicians accountable we would have a better country. This is just an idea to help make this country better. I’m sure that there are many other American citizens who could add even more to this. It would be used to protect all American citizens from corrupt, immoral politicians who take money or gratuities from corporations, private individuals and or other governments. This should be a requirement for all elected politicians only. If you have any ideas or thoughts pass this on or add to it.
Freedom is not free, your words are the first shots fired to acquire your freedoms, not only for you but for your children and their future, If we going to fight a war let’s fight it like, it’s going to be the last one, if we are going to do something let’s do it right, with the best of our abilities, let’s do it right so we do not have to do it again,
Violating the Bill of Rights is a Human Rights Violation. I AGREE …. a Treason Act would be a GREAT THING. I support it 100%. We Need a FaceBook Site ….. Are You Going To Do It OR SHOULD I ? Thanks SUPER IDEA
I think a Treason Act for Violating the Bill of Rights is a SUPER IDEA. Violating the Bill of Rights is after all a Human Rights Violation. We Start a FaceBook Site …… Your Idea is a SOUND and APPROPRIATE One …… I am on board 100% Judson Witham
jurisnot I believe we all have to do our part, there is no accountability for these criminals,who hold office in this country, they have no honor, they have no morals,and if we the people do not raise our voices in anger, and objection to their activities, who will stop them. The only time a politician loses his job, or is held accountable, is when he screws over another politician with more power, by doing and saying nothing we condemn these actions, you are not alone, join as many patriot groups as you can, join the fight. Thank you for your reply bill sharpe
So if You were to Author an Act / Law that were similar to the Anti Sedition Act ….. The Anti Bill of Rights Act would make it a Jail Offense based on a Scale of High Crimes and Misdemeanors for Government Employees , Officials, Law Enforcement, Judges and Prosecutors to NEGLIGENTLY and or Intentionally violate the Human and Civil Rights ( Bill of Rights ) of Americans and People Generally. I am 100% in stripping the COURT CREATED Immunities ….. The Immunities themselves are a VAST CRIME SCENE. But seriously How would this Anti Bill Of Rights Act work and what provisions should it contain ? For Bill Sharpe https://www.facebook.com/groups/1577242979164235/